| The U.S. Army was    overwhelmed when WikiLeaks published more than 700,000 secret diplomatic and    war documents handed over by soldier Bradley Manning, a retired officer    testified in the sentencing phase of the convicted private's court-martial. "The ones that hit    us in the face were the Iraq logs," retired Brigadier General Robert    Carr said in a Fort Meade, Maryland court on Wednesday, a day after a    military judge found Manning guilty of 19 charges over the leaks in 2010, the    biggest breach of classified data in U.S. history. "No one had ever had    to deal with this number of documents," Carr said. A prosecutor told the    sentencing hearing that the leaks caused military intelligence officials to    rethink how much access to allow low level intelligence analysts like    Manning. Judge Colonel Denise Lind    began hearing arguments on Wednesday on how long a sentence he should face,    with the soldier's lawyers expected to argue for leniency. While Manning, 25, was    acquitted on the most serious charge of aiding the enemy, sparing him life    without parole, he could still face decades in a military prison. The slightly built Army private    first class was in Baghdad in 2010 when he was arrested and charged with    leaking files including videos of a 2007 attack by an American Apache    helicopter gunship in Baghdad that killed a dozen people, including two    Reuters news staff, diplomatic cables, and secret details on prisoners held    at Guantanamo Bay. TALIBAN TIE Carr testified that the    leaks allowed Taliban militants in Afghanistan to track down a citizen of    that country who had worked with U.S. intelligence. "The Taliban killed    him and tied him to the disclosures," Carr said. He said that would    deter other intelligence sources. Manning's lawyers were    expected to argue that the Army private was not trying to jeopardize U.S.    national security. He did not testify during his trial or during the first    day of his sentencing hearing. A prosecutor, Major    Ashden Fein, said Manning's leaks "have impacted the entire system"    for granting defence analysts access to classified information. Some observers pointed    out that the case of Manning, as well as that of former CIA security    contractor Edward Snowden, illustrated the risk inherent in granting security    clearance so broadly. Snowden last month released to media documents    detailing U.S. programs to monitor phone and internet usage. U.S. intelligence    agencies grant analysts broad access to classified files in hopes that they    will connect disparate pieces of evidence to interpret events and avoid the    sort of lapses that led to clues being overlooked before the September 11,    2001 hijacked plane attacks and the bombing of the Boston Marathon in April. "As with any type of    computer database and security, the weakest link is the person who's    operating it," said Scott White, a professor of homeland security    management at Drexel University in Philadelphia. There is a risk in    restricting access, he said: "Do you slow the intelligence process down    by putting more and more limits on your own people?" In a court martial that    stretched over two months, military prosecutors had argued that Manning    became a "traitor" to his country when he handed over files to    WikiLeaks, thrusting the anti-secrecy website and its founder Julian Assange    into the international spotlight. Observers said the    verdict could have "a chilling effect" on WikiLeaks by making    potential sources of documents in the United States more wary about handing    over secret information. It could also encourage    the United States to seek to prosecute Assange for his role in publishing the    information. Assange has been living    in the Ecuadorean embassy in London for over a year to avoid extradition to    Sweden, where two women have accused him of sexual assault. The activist says    he fears Sweden might hand him over to U.S. authorities. | 
YOUR COMMENT
